220_C099
PARTIES DISPUTE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

Commercial Auto

Statute Of Limitations Begins On Date Claim Is Denied

 

Eddie Sellers, a resident of Mississippi, was driving his father's car on September 28, 1996 when he was involved in an automobile accident in Tennessee. Shane Thurman, a passenger in the car, was seriously injured, and Thurman's minor son, Dalton, was killed. Eddie was not working for his father at the time of the accident. Eddie and his father, Donald, were named as defendants in a Tennessee lawsuit resulting from the accident.

 

Donald Sellers had an American States Insurance Company (American States) business liability policy for $1 million and an umbrella insurance policy for up to $1 million covering his Mississippi business, Donnie's Amoco. He had purchased this insurance through Brenda and Eddie Oaks of Oaks Insurance Company, agents for DeSoto Insurance (DeSoto). The umbrella policy provided coverage for business, not personal, liability. The policy was renewed by payment of premiums and was in effect on the date of Eddie Sellers' accident.

 

Sellers notified his agents of the accident and asked them to file a claim with American States. On August 26, 1997, American States sent Sellers written notice denying his claim. According to American States, the umbrella policy did not provide coverage because Eddie was not acting in the course and scope of Sellers' business at the time of the accident. Donald Sellers was eventually found personally liable for the injuries caused by his son's negligence. He appealed this decision to the Tennessee Supreme Court, but the court refused to hear the case. Sellers then filed suit in a Mississippi court alleging that the Oaks, Oaks Insurance Company, and DeSoto had failed to procure the requested insurance and adequately explain the coverage. This lawsuit was filed in January 13, 2003, more than five years after American States' denied the claim.

 

The Mississippi statute of limitations provides that "[a]ll actions for which no other period of limitation is prescribed shall be commenced within three (3) years next after the cause of such action occurred, and not after." Defendants Oaks and DeSoto filed a motion asking the trial court to dismiss Sellers' lawsuit because the statute of limitations had expired. The trial court denied their motion. They appealed to the Supreme Court of Mississippi, and the court agreed to address the statute of limitations issue.

 

On appeal, Sellers asserted that the three-year statute of limitations began to run on the date of the "actual injury." According to Sellers, the "actual injury" occurred when the Tennessee Court of Appeals declared him to be liable for his son's actions. That date was February 16, 2001, less than three years from the date he filed the lawsuit. The defendants argued that the statute of limitations began to run on the date that American States denied Sellers' claim: August 26, 1997.

 

The Supreme Court of Mississippi found that the trial court erred by finding in favor of Sellers. In reaching its decision, the court noted that it was clear that the insurance policies were for business insurance only. Even if Sellers had never received copies of the actual policies, his knowledge of their contents was to be assumed, especially in light of the fact that he had renewed them. The court also emphasized that Sellers knew in August 1997 that his claim had been denied, and at that point he was put on notice that there could be a problem. Sellers was aware of his potential liability on the date American States denied the claim, not the date the Tennessee court found him liable. Thus, the statute of limitations began to run on August 26, 1997, the date Sellers received notice of denial of his claim. More than five years had passed from the date Sellers filed his lawsuit against the defendants, so the statute of limitations barred the lawsuit.

 

The decision of the lower court was reversed and it was directed to dismiss Sellers' claims against the Oaks and DeSoto.

 

Oaks vs. Sellers-No. 2006-IA-00005-SCT-Supreme Court of Mississippi-April 12, 2007-953 Southern Reporter 2d 1077